{"id":308,"date":"2017-01-21T20:38:07","date_gmt":"2017-01-21T20:38:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/?p=308"},"modified":"2017-01-21T20:38:07","modified_gmt":"2017-01-21T20:38:07","slug":"horror-vs-terror","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/2017\/01\/21\/horror-vs-terror\/","title":{"rendered":"Horror Vs Terror"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Branching off from my previous blog post, I have decided to discuss in today\u2019s post how <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/home\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\"><em>The Mail Online <\/em><\/a>and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thesun.co.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\"><em>The Sun<\/em> <\/a>approached their news story coverage on the event of a \u2018terrifying\u2019 open fire attack in a Spanish supermarket.<\/p>\n<p>When reading both articles, I can\u2019t help but roll my eyes over the fact that both headlined articles imply the attack to be of \u2018terror\u2019 and assumes the perpetrator is of an Islamic faith as he supposedly screams \u201cAllahu Akbar\u201d. Already, is this not racially stereotypical enough?<\/p>\n<p><em>The Mail Online\u2019s<\/em> headline read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-4110542\/Gunman-screaming-Allahu-Akbar-opens-fire-Spanish-supermarket.html?ito=social-facebook\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cGunman screaming &#8216;Allahu Akbar&#8217; opens fire in Spanish supermarket while wearing &#8216;suicide vest&#8217; filled with gasoline and gunpowder\u201d<\/a> \u2013 immediately, despite not using crude terms towards the event or the perpetrator, <em>The Daily Mail<\/em> allow their readership to make an assumption and categorise the perpetrator through key words within the article, such as \u201cAllahu Akbar\u201d, \u201csuicide vest\u201d, \u201cgasoline\u201d and \u201cgunpowder\u201d. Being a heightened moral panic within society, the major stereotypical assumption made by <em>The Mail Online <\/em>is that the gunman was committing an act of terror.<\/p>\n<p>Now, when taking a look at <em>The Sun\u2019s<\/em> headline of this event, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thesun.co.uk\/news\/2591800\/gunman-opens-fire-in-spanish-supermarket-while-carrying-bag-filled-with-petrol-and-gunpowder\/\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cSUPERMARKET HORROR Gunman opens fire in Spanish supermarket while \u2018carrying bag filled with petrol and gunpowder\u2019\u201d<\/a>, a totally different, eye-opening view is pictured of this event. Firstly, in comparison to <em>The Daily Mail\u2019s <\/em>headline, it can be noticed how there is no clear illustration of what the \u2018gunman\u2019 looks like. Further on this point, there happens to be a significant difference in narrative between the two headlines. Whilst <em>The Mail Online <\/em>deliberately create this terrifying image of a suicide bomber, was the actual reality that the perpetrator was really holding these harmful substances in his bag?<\/p>\n<p>Despite the considerable difference the two tabloids construct within their headlined articles of the event, <em>The Sun,<\/em> however, had a similar broadcast to <em>The Daily Mail <\/em>when they first published their article. Mistakenly, <em>The Sun<\/em> posted online \u201cSUPERMARKET TERROR Gunman \u2018screaming Allahu Akbar\u2019 opens fire in Spanish supermarket while \u2018carrying bag filled with petrol and gunpowder\u2019\u201d. Directly, <em>The Sun <\/em>instantly claim this event to be a terror attack, whilst linking to the Islamic faith, stating the perpetrator said \u201cAllahu Akbar\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Miqdaad Versi, board member of Rights Watch (UK), posted an image on Twitter containing both versions of <em>The Sun\u2019s <\/em>take on the event. In the image below, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/miqdaad?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor\" target=\"_blank\">Miqdaad Versi <\/a>heatedly states in his tweet against <em>The Sun\u2019s<\/em> poor blunder \u201cThe Sun corrects false claim of terror attack by gunman shouting Allahu Akbar (actually robbery by Stefan): no recognition\/apology for error\u201d. As <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/miqdaad?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor\" target=\"_blank\">Miqdaad Versi<\/a> labels both images, it is clearly shown how\u00a0<em>The Sun <\/em>carefully<em>\u00a0<\/em>change their wording to recreate a more realistic scene of the event.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_309\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-309\" style=\"width: 615px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/miqdaad\/status\/819821028784349184\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-309\" src=\"http:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/73\/2017\/01\/the-sun.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"615\" height=\"563\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/73\/2017\/01\/the-sun.png 615w, https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/73\/2017\/01\/the-sun-300x275.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 615px) 100vw, 615px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-309\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Tweet posted by Miqdaad Versi on 13\/01\/17.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&#8220;Actually robbery by Stefan&#8221; creates this humorous undertone, proving how ridiculous and daring\u00a0<em>The Sun\u00a0<\/em>and <em>The Mail Online&#8217;s\u00a0<\/em>headlines actually are. But is it really necessary to go to such an extreme in suggesting the perpetrator was a terrorist? How can these tabloid newspapers be trusted for 24\/7 news coverage, when they persistently alter the truth for a what they&#8217;d note as a thrill factor?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Branching off from my previous blog post, I have decided to discuss in today\u2019s post how The Mail Online and The Sun approached their news story coverage on the event of a \u2018terrifying\u2019 open fire attack in a Spanish supermarket. When reading both articles, I can\u2019t help but roll my eyes over the fact that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":65,"featured_media":311,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[7,6,12,14,11,10,13],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/65"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=308"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":312,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308\/revisions\/312"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blog.buprojects.uk\/2016-2017\/charlottelockeridge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}